Same ole debate with it's not guns that mass kill at random it's the people who use them.
Flip that...
And it becomes people wouldn't mass kill at random if there were no guns available.
Whether the yanks want to hear it or not, Australia has proved that getting rid of guns after the Port Douglas massacre back in 1996 has stopped that shit from happening here.
The 2nd Amendment is built upon the history that governments oppress their people when the government disarms them. The 1st Amendment is built upon the history of governments jailing people for speaking out against the government.
If you make the argument that the 2nd should be revised because of modern weaponry, you may as well make the same against the 1st because of the inferwebs and other technologies that allow speech to travel world wide instantly. I've read many euro comentaries that believe we should and regularly jail people for saying things "illegal"
Personally, dead kids, not even millions of them, are worth a single God Given Inalienable Right. When the people of this country werent a buncha faggit loving degenerates and we publicly executed those who were, we didnt have this level of violence. Taking guns and free speech away is going after a symptom, not a problem.
I dont want us to be australia, germany, england, or any other country that has an even worse and oppressive government than we have here.